LawSchools99 logoLawSchools99
Mumbai University · Second Year LLB · Semester 3
Rule of Law - Dicey and Modern Developments
“Be you ever so high, the law is above you” — Thomas Fuller. The Rule of Law (la principe de légalité) is the ancient principle, traceable to Aristotle and Bracton, that government must be conducted according to law, not according to the arbitrary will of men. Its classical modern exposition is by A

Origin & Meaning

“Be you ever so high, the law is above you” — Thomas Fuller. The Rule of Law (la principe de légalité) is the ancient principle, traceable to Aristotle and Bracton, that government must be conducted according to law, not according to the arbitrary will of men. Its classical modern exposition is by A.V. Dicey in Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution (1885).

Dicey’s Three Postulates

  1. Supremacy of Law — absence of arbitrary power: No one shall be punished or made to suffer in body or goods except for a distinct breach of law established in the ordinary legal manner before the ordinary courts.
  2. Equality before the Law: Every person, whatever his rank or status, is subject to the ordinary law of the realm and amenable to the jurisdiction of the ordinary tribunals. No special courts, no special privileges for officials.
  3. Predominance of the Legal Spirit (Constitution is result of ordinary law): General principles of the Constitution (e.g. right to personal liberty, right of public meeting) are the result of judicial decisions in particular cases, not of a priori constitutional declarations.

Criticisms of Dicey

  • His third postulate is England-specific and does not apply to countries with written constitutions.
  • He misunderstood Droit Administratif — the Conseil d’État is in fact a strong protector of citizens’ rights.
  • His absolute equality is impracticable in the modern welfare State — where differential treatment for public servants (e.g. protection under Article 311), women, Scheduled Castes/Tribes is often justified.
  • He failed to foresee the inevitable growth of delegated legislation and administrative discretion.

Modern Concept — International Commission of Jurists (Delhi Declaration, 1959)

The Rule of Law should encompass:

  1. Representative, democratic government.
  2. Economic, social and cultural rights, not just civil-political rights.
  3. Independent judiciary.
  4. Freedom of thought, expression and the press.
  5. Fair criminal process.

Rule of Law in India

The Indian Constitution gives Rule of Law a constitutional status:

  • Article 14 — equality before law and equal protection of laws.
  • Article 21 — procedure established by law; now “just, fair and reasonable” procedure (Maneka Gandhi).
  • Articles 32 & 226 — writ jurisdiction for enforcement.
  • Article 311 — protection of civil servants.
  • Articles 50, 136, 227 — judicial independence & review.

Leading Cases

Keshavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala, AIR 1973 SC 1461 — Rule of Law held to be part of the basic structure of the Constitution.
Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain, AIR 1975 SC 2299 — Rule of Law struck down Article 329A(4) inserted by the 39th Amendment.
A.D.M. Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla, AIR 1976 SC 1207 — majority diluted Rule of Law during Emergency; Khanna J.’s famous dissent reaffirmed Rule of Law; majority overruled in K.S. Puttaswamy v. UOI, (2017) 10 SCC 1.
Som Raj v. State of Haryana, AIR 1990 SC 1176 — absence of arbitrary power is the first essential of Rule of Law.
Chief Settlement Commissioner v. Om Prakash, AIR 1969 SC 33 — State must act in accordance with law.
Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab, AIR 1980 SC 898 — Rule of Law excludes arbitrariness.

Rule of Law and Administrative Law

Administrative law is often described as a technique for enforcing the Rule of Law in the administrative sphere — through judicial review, natural justice, reasoned decisions, and remedies against the State.

Dicey’s postulates = S.E.P. — Supremacy of law, Equality before law, Predominance of legal spirit.
Ask yourself: Is government action authorised by law? Is it non-arbitrary? Is it subject to judicial review? Three positive answers = compliance with Rule of Law.